Skip to content
2019.01.24 10:01

LAG vs LACP: What’s the Difference?

조회 수 295 추천 수 0 댓글 0


Prev이전 문서

Next다음 문서

크게 작게 위로 아래로 댓글로 가기 인쇄 첨부


Prev이전 문서

Next다음 문서

크게 작게 위로 아래로 댓글로 가기 인쇄 첨부

In the field of Ethernet switch connection, link aggregation is a technology to combine multiple ports in parallel between different network switches. It functions to expand bandwidth cost-effectively and to provide redundancy in link failure. However, the umbrella term “link aggregation” is rather a broad terminology containing various conceptions: Link Aggregation Control Protocol, Link Aggregation Group, MLAG, 802.3ad, 802.1AX, etc. Among them the issue of LAG vs LACP confuses many people. Here we introduce LAG vs LACP in sequence and compare LAG vs LACP to illustrate their relationships and differences.




LAG vs LACP: What Is LAG?

LAG (Link Aggregation Group) is an actual technique or instance for link aggregation. A Link Aggregation Group forms when we connect multiple ports in parallel between two switches and configure them as LAG. As thus LAG builds up multiple links between two switches, which expands bandwidth. Besides, it provides link-level redundancy in network failure and load-balance traffic. Even if one link fails, the remaining links between the two switches will still be running. They also take over those traffic supposed to traverse via the failed one, so data packet won’t get lost.

LAG vs LACP: What Is LACP?

LACP (Link Aggregation Control Protocol) is a control protocol to set up LAGs automatically. So you can choose to build a static LAG without LACP. Or you can choose to set up a dynamic LAG by using LACP. Simply put, LACP is not a link aggregation instance but a protocol for defining it. LACP enables LAG to transfer from static LAG to dynamic LAG, which allows information exchange of the link aggregation between the LAG component network switches. The information is delivered as packet in Link Aggregation Control Protocol Data Units (LACPDUs). And each port on both switches can be configured to be active or passive via the control protocol to be either preferential to transfer LACPDUs or not.

LAG Implementation Scenario

Since LACP is only a protocol for Link Aggregation Group. We’ll omit the LAG vs LACP differentiation to see LAG implementation scenario by FS.COM. Taking the LAG between two gigabit PoE network switches and another 10GbE fiber switch as example. While simply connecting one port on each gigabit PoE switch with one cable, we get 1GE bandwidth. However, when you double link, triple link or higher multiples, the bandwidth will become 2GE, 3GE and so on.

Further, to uplink a backbone core switch, we can use 4 fiber patch cables with corresponding modules to link the 48 port gigabit PoE switch 10GE SFP+ ports and the 10GbE fiber optic switch. Then the uplink bandwidth on the S1600-48T4S expands to 40GE. In the case two LAGs form on the 48 port PoE switch. The link upper limit to form a LAG and the number of LAGs between two switches vary from vendor and switch models.




Figure 1: Linking 4 1GE ports in parallel on FS 48 port PoE switch and 24 port PoE switch to set up a LAG, which boosts bandwidth from 1000Mbps to 4 × 1000Mbps. In this photo two LAGs have been implemented on the FS 48 port PoE switch.

LAG vs LACP : Link Aggregation Advantages to Expand Bandwidth

Whether LAG deploying Link Aggregation Control Protocol or not, it requires no expensive hardware upgrade. Therefore Link Aggregation Group provides a cost-effective solution for bandwidth expansion. Stacking switch is indeed an advanced method to obtain higher bandwidth. However, it is restricted to stackable switch and does not support separate placing. To buy a higher speed switch like a 10GbE switch is also an direct and effective solution. But for ordinary users this hardware upgrade is over budget.

LAG vs LACP: What’s the Difference?

  • Link Aggregation Group is a practical instance of link aggregation whereas LACP is a protocol for auto-configuring and maintaining LAG.
  • LAG without Link Aggregation Control Protocol is a static configuration, in which each pair of ports in a LAG require manual configuration respectively. However, LACP enabled ports are dynamic configuration, which enable to auto-configure into trunk groups when building LAG.
  • When talking about LAG vs LACP, one usually refer to static LAG without LACP vs dynamic LAG with LACP. Generally speaking, dynamic LAG configuration owns advantages over static LAG configuration for automatic failover occur and mutual dynamic configuration. In static link aggregation, LAG cannot detach configuration or cabling errors so as to cause unnecessary network troubles.


LAG vs LACP issue is put forward for the confusing conception between them. LAG is an actual instance for link aggregation. LACP is a control protocol to enable LAG automatically configure network switch ports, detach link failure and activate failover. So LAG encompasses both static LAG configuration and dynamic LAG configuration on the basis of whether employing optional Link Aggregation Control Protocol or not. As a whole, Link Aggregation Group is a cost-effective way to expand bandwidth over switch stacking and other hardware upgrade methods. For minimizing network link failure, LACP enabled dynamic LAG configuration over static LAG is a much better solution to go.


출처 : http://www.fiber-optic-components.com/llag-vs-lacp-relationship-difference.html


공부 게시판

공부에 도움되는 글을 올려주세요.

List of Articles
번호 분류 제목 글쓴이 날짜 조회 수
공지 [공지] 공부 게시판 입니다. 처누 2003.08.17 828898
2489 윈도우즈 윈도우10 업데이트 후 네트워크 공유폴더가 안열린다면... file JaeSoo 2019.03.13 115
2488 네트워크 무료 핑 테스트(PingTester) 대체 프로그램 3개 JaeSoo 2019.03.05 207
2487 업무 공공기관 관련 법령, 지침 JaeSoo 2019.02.08 57
2486 윈도우즈 Windows 수명 주기 팩트 시트 JaeSoo 2019.02.07 46
2485 업무 다수공급자계약(MAS) 제도 소개 file JaeSoo 2019.01.24 169
2484 업무 다수공급자계약(MAS) 2단계경쟁제도 JaeSoo 2019.01.24 182
» 하드웨어 LAG vs LACP: What’s the Difference? file JaeSoo 2019.01.24 295
2482 하드웨어 LACP Active/Passive, Dynamic/Static JaeSoo 2019.01.24 149
2481 하드웨어 티밍 (Link Aggregation)에 대해 알아보자 JaeSoo 2019.01.24 288
2480 유닉스/리눅스 Btrfs vs EXT4 - 파일시스템 비교 file JaeSoo 2019.01.24 145
2479 웹서버,WAS Netdata - Linux 시스템 용 실시간 성능 모니터링 도구 file JaeSoo 2019.01.18 349
2478 웹서버,WAS netdata 에 php-fpm, mariadb 모니터링 추가 file JaeSoo 2019.01.18 138
2477 모바일 모바일 관리 솔루션 MDM, MAM, EMM, UEM의 차이 JaeSoo 2019.01.15 173
2476 생활 고양시(행신) - 동탄 SRT 역 (지하철, 시외버스) JaeSoo 2018.08.29 1620
2475 생활 워커홀릭(Workholic), 알콜홀릭(Alcoholic), -holic file JaeSoo 2018.08.25 1026
2474 업무 Python & R vs. SPSS & SAS file JaeSoo 2018.08.20 601
2473 업무 R과 SAS 비교 JaeSoo 2018.08.20 253
2472 웹서버,WAS Tomcat7 성능 튜닝 방법 JaeSoo 2018.07.26 644
2471 웹서버,WAS Tomcat7 Tuning file JaeSoo 2018.07.26 665
2470 취업 늦은 나이에 도전한 공무원 합격 수기(스압죄송;;) JaeSoo 2018.07.24 753
Board Pagination Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 126 Next
/ 126


■ 즐겨찾기 - 가족
JAESOO's HOMEPAGE YOUNGAE's HOMEPAGE 장여은 홈페이지 장여희 홈페이지 장여원 홈페이지

■ 즐겨찾기 - 업무
알리카페 홀릭 숭실대 컴퓨터 통신연구실 (서창진) 말레이시아 KL Sentral 한국인 GuestHouse

■ 즐겨찾기 - 취미
어드민아이디 유에코 사랑회 아스가르드 좋은사람/나쁜사람 JServer.kr 제이서버 메타블로그 재수 티스토리

■ 즐겨찾기 - 강의, 커뮤니티
재수 강의 홈페이지 한소리 VTMODE.COM 숭실대 인공지능학과 숭실대 통신연구실

PageViews   Today : 1,780   Yesterday : 3,904   Total : 62,460,055  /  Counter Status   Today : 437   Yesterday : 616   Total : 3,557,525
Site Info   Member : 1,438  /  Total documents : 7,704   New documents : 0  /  Total comments : 536

design by by JAESOO.com

sketchbook5, 스케치북5

sketchbook5, 스케치북5

나눔글꼴 설치 안내

이 PC에는 나눔글꼴이 설치되어 있지 않습니다.

이 사이트를 나눔글꼴로 보기 위해서는
나눔글꼴을 설치해야 합니다.

설치 취소